suggestions from Peter von Kaehne, re: usfm2osis.py (title tentative)

I saw your note re plans to create a new USFM to OSIS importer.

May I make the suggestion to make this a BCV rather than a BSP importer?

The reasons

1) carefully imported they should look the same in all frontends.

2) No frontend ever supported sections as a method of addressing chunks
of texts, nor is any likely. Sections and paragraphes are important
presentationally + exegetically, but really do not offer us much in
terms addressing/programming.

3) The ongoing osis2mod saga is not ever going to get resolved, I guess,
so a format closer to the internal format will allow us to consider
alternative ways to move from OSIS to a module.

4) Having an XML format where verses are addressable via XPath improves
the ability to postprocess OSIS files. I am working slowly on various
"upgrades" we can do on PD modules - cross references, WoJ markup,
possibly eventually in some form Strongs. There is a need for study
bibles in many languages and this is my attempt to provide such or make
provision easier than it is now.

5) Equivalence of commentary and bible module - this would allow us to
import USFM encoded commentaries/study bibles in a better way.

I am sure there are more.

I could come up with no reason why we should prefer the existing BSP import.